 |
|
A fragment of Maimonides' (1135-1204) draft of his
Mishnah commentary, written in his youth. © John Rylands University
Library of Manchester.
Click to enlarge |
|
Articles
•
2008
•
2007
•
2006
•
2005
•
2004
|
2008 |
|
Tobias Green, "Equal Partners? Proselytising by Africans
and Jews in the 17th Century Atlantic Diaspora",
Melilah 2008/1, pp.1-12.
PDF or
Word
Related maps:
Caboverde and
Peoples and Cultures
This paper examines the processes by which Africans
proselytised Sephardic Jews on the coast of West Africa
in the 16th and 17th centuries and were in their turn
prosleytised by Jews both in West Africa and elsewhere
in the Atlantic world in the early modern era. Drawing
on a wide range of archival and published sources, it
shows that these activities were far from unusual in the
Atlantic world at the time, and are evidence of a world
of receptivity and understanding that belies traditional
interpretations of Atlantic history. Analysing the
conditions which produced the atmosphere in which such
mutual conversions could occur, the paper argues that a
relatively equitable balance of power was central to
this process. Personal knowledge and human experience
were crucial in breaking down cultural barriers in a way
which permitted conversion; however the wider economic
forces which facilitated these exchanges were themselves
distorting power relations, helping to shape Atlantic
history on its more familiar, and intolerant, path.
|
|
2007 |
|
Roy
Shasha, "The Forms and Functions of Lists in the
Mishnah"
(PhD thesis, University of Manchester, 2006)
This
study researches from a synchronic standpoint the
different forms and functions of lists in the Mishnah.
The study commences with a brief survey not only of
lists in Biblical and early Rabbinic texts, but also the
wider literature of the Ancient Near East. The
relationship of the mishnaic list to its surrounding
text is investigated in depth. The appendices contain
comprehensive databases of the locations and
descriptions of the different types of mishnaic lists,
as well as a comparison of lists of the Mishnah to the
lists of the Tosefta.
Contents and Introduction
Chapter 1: The definition of a Mishnaic list
Chapter 2: The components of the Mishnaic list
Chapter 3: Types and features of lists in the Mishnah
Chapter 4: Special features that modify the structure of
simple and compound lists
Chapter 5: The list's relationship with its co-text and
with the entirety of the Mishnah
Conclusion, Appendices and Tables
|
|
2006
|
|
Tony Kushner, "Bill Williams and Jewish Historiography:
Past, Present and Future", Melilah 2006/1,
pp.1-14.
PDF or
Word
See also
The Bill Williams Jewish
Studies Library
Any student of modern British Jewry who
wants to understand not only the subject matter but how
to approach it has to begin with Bill Williams’ The
Making of Manchester Jewry, 1740-1875 (1976). Williams’
approach blurs the barriers between politics, culture
and society and his influence can be detected as much
within literary and cultural scholars of British Jewry,
such as Bryan Cheyette and Nadia Valman, as historians
such as Tony Kushner and David Cesarani. With his many
accomplishments in the fields of heritage and history,
Williams has provided a remarkable legacy in terms of
publications, museums, organisations and in the training
and inspiration of later generations of scholars and
activists. Sander Gilman has asked us to “imagine a new
Jewish history written as the history of the Jews at the
frontier, a history with no center; a history marked by
the dynamics of change, confrontation, and
accommodation; a history which focuses on the present
and in which all participants are given voice. It is the
place of the ‘migrant culture of the in-between.’“
Rather than a utopian vision, Bill Williams’ work has
provided an example of how this ideal can be achieved in
practice.
|
|
Ghil'ad Zuckermann, "Comparative Constructions in
'Israeli Hebrew'", Melilah 2006/2, pp.1-16.
PDF or
Word
'Hebrew' is one of the official languages - with Arabic
and English - of the State of Israel, established in
1948 on 20,770 km2 in the 'Middle' East. Israeli emerged
at the end of the nineteenth century and the beginning
of the twentieth. Its symbolic first native
speaker, Itamar Ben-Yehuda, began speaking in 1886.
Israeli is a fusional synthetic language, with
non-concatenative discontinuous morphemes realised by
vowel infixation. This typological paper demonstrates
that the typical Israeli comparative construction
involves a copula or verbless clause construction, with
the 'Parameter' as copula complement (CC) or as a
verbless clause complement (VCC). However, there is
another mono-clausal comparative construction, in which
the 'Index' of comparison is the main verb in an
extended intransitive clause. Future research would
demonstrate that Israeli comparatives correspond with
Yiddish and 'Standard Average European', although the
forms used are Hebrew.
|
|
2005 |
|
Rabbi
Dr. Yehudah Abel, "The Plight of the 'Agunah and
Conditional Marriage", Melilah 2005/1, pp.1-41.
PDF
or
Word
The debate over conditional marriage as a
possible solution to the problem of ‘iggun receives
relatively little attention from contemporary halakhic
authorities. The issue is assumed to have been “put to
sleep” by the opposition to the French and Turkish
proposals of the early 20th century, as voiced in the
responsa collected in ’Eyn Tenai Be-Nissu’in (1930) and
despite the response to those arguments by R. Eliezer
Berkovits in his Tenai Be-Nissu’in Uv-Get (1966). This
paper provides a detailed summary and review of the
arguments in those publications (which are not
universally accessible). An analysis of further sources
relevant to conditional marriage is being prepared, and
will appear in a separate working paper.
|
|
Stephen M. Passamaneck, "Biblical Arsonists and Sabbath
Firemen: Matters of Public Safety", Melilah
2005/2, pp.1-28.
PDF
or
Word
Fire was both a
frequent and unwelcome visitor to all manner of human
settlements, and until very recent times usually spelled
large scale destruction and a heavy toll of dead and
injured. Curiously, the Hebrew Bible clearly refers to the
destructive power of fire, yet mentions its destructive
capacity only once in a legal context, and takes no notice
at all of the crime of arson which apparently appears in a
few incidents in biblical narrative. Early rabbinic
literature focuses on what sort of property may be saved
from flames on the Sabbath, when the law forbids both the
kindling and the extinction of fire. Obviously, fire is no
respecter of Jewish law and the ruling against
extinguishing flames on the Sabbath
– except where human life was in
clear danger
– went through a long and slow
process of transformation, until firefighting was no
longer forbidden. This article examines that
transformation over the centuries.
|
|
Bill Williams, "'Displaced Scholars': Refugees at the
University of Manchester", Melilah 2005/3,
pp.1-29.
PDF or
Word
The paper explores the responses of one institution of
higher learning in Britain, the University of
Manchester, to those academics and students displaced by
the rise of European Fascism and particularly by the
discriminatory polices of the Nazi regime. Drawing on
material in the Vice Chancellor’s Archive at the
University it assesses the degree to which the
undoubtedly liberal intentions of the University
hierarchy, which found expression in the formation of a
Joint Committee of Council and Senate on Assistance to
Foreign Scholars (JCAFS), were complicated by its
willingness to work within the restrictions on alien
immigrants imposed by the British state, by
considerations of self-interest and by the innate
elitism of the Manchester academy. In doing so, it
examines the membership and selection procedures the
JCAFS, the sources of its funds, its relationship to the
national Academic Assistance Council, and its
achievements in terms of the scholars and scholarship
attracted to the University and, through it, to the
British and American academies. The Vice-Chancellor’s
archive also makes it possible to assess the
consequences of the Anglo-German student exchange scheme
of which the university was a party and the degree to
which the University co-operated with the International
Student Service (ISS) in finding places for students
whose hopes had been dashed by the rise of Fascism. One
theme throughout the paper is the extent to which
University policies were influenced by the Jewish
origins of most displaced academics and students.
|
|
2004 |
|
Bernard S.
Jackson, "Agunah and the Problem of Authority:
Directions for Future Research", Melilah 2004/1,
pp.1-78.
PDF
or
Word
This paper provides a preliminary analysis of the
issues to be researched by the Agunah Research Unit at the
University of Manchester, which seeks a global solution to the
halakhic problems of the agunah (mesurevet get).
Frequently, halakhic resistance to change appears to be based on
historical claims which appear questionable in the light of research
into halakhic history. Thus terminative conditions, commencing with
one discussed by R. Yose in the Jerusalem Talmud, appear to have
been used from time to time, despite the maxim eyn t’nai
benisu’in. There is a variant reading of Amemar’s ruling on the
wife proclaiming ma’us alay in Ketubot 63b, according to
which he appears to have been willing to coerce the husband. The
nature of the coercion practised by the Geonim in favour of the
moredet may well have amounted to the Rosh’s later description
of that practice as amounting to annulment. The extent of Rabbenu
Tam’s opposition to the measures of the Geonim is unclear, in the
light of apparently contradictory statements in the Sefer
Hayashar. Such historical claims have to be viewed in the
context of the authority structure of the halakhah, and in
particular such questions as the status of the demand for consensus,
the application of the principle of (and exceptions to) hilkheta
kebatr’ai and the theological arguments advanced against
reliance on new manuscript discoveries. The paper concludes with an
outline argument for a multi-faceted approach, combining conditions,
coercion and annulment, and exploiting the possibilities for
leniency opened by the doctrine of sfek sfeika.
|
|
Rocco Bernasconi, "Reasons for Norms in Mishnaic
Discourse: Some Formal, Functional, and Conceptual
Observations", Melilah 2004/2, pp.1-61.
PDF
or
Word
The Mishnah does not generally account for the validity
of its legal provisions, yet, occasionally reasons or warrants are
given. This thesis tries to explore, classify and analyse the
reasons encountered in seven sample tractates. Within these limits,
the thesis attempts to identify formal and functional
classifications of different kinds of reasons, based on
literary-synchronic investigation. For the initial analysis of the
Mishnaic text, a classification of reasons distinguishes them
according to their grammatical, syntactical and argumentative
traits. As for reason type, one can find ‘dependent’ and
‘independent’ reasons: the former quotes Scripture, a ma’aseh, or a
minhag, while the latter articulates directly some fact or
observation which is logically related to the apodosis (or
protasis). It is also possible to distinguish between arguments and
types of reasons in that a single argument may possibly carry
various kinds of explanation (e.g. linguistic, legal, or factual).
The second section describes the co-textual and contextual relations
in which Mishnaic reasons stand to the hypothetical legal cases, and
their function within the discourse. An attempt to conceptualise the
Mishnaic activity of ‘giving reasons’ leads me to pose the following
wider questions: 1. How is the reason formally expressed? 2. Does
the reason increase or limit the range of application of the
protasis (or of the apodosis)? 3. What is the type of argument used
in support of the reason? 4. What kind of explanation does the
reason, seen in the context of its argument provide? 5. What type of
norm is explained by the reason? 6. Is the reason provided a final
reason or does it call, in the way in which it is formulated, for
further interpretation or expansion?
|
|
Daniel R. Langton, "A Question of Backbone: Comparing
Christian Influences upon the Origins of Reform and
Liberal Judaism in England", Melilah 2004/3,
pp.1-47.
PDF
or
Word
The late British historian David Englander once
described the Judaism practiced by the acculturated
upper classes of nineteenth-century British Jewry as “an
invertebrate religion”. It was, he explained, “deficient
in doctrine, without rigour in ritual, and lacking
spiritual warmth.” Many contemporary Jews would have
agreed with his assessment and the emergence of Reform
Judaism in 1840 and of Liberal Judaism some 70 years
later can be viewed as attempts to remedy the situation,
to inject some backbone in the religious belief and
practice of the Anglo-Jewish community. Without wishing
to detract from a range of other historical and
sociological explanations, one very significant factor
for such developments was the internalisation of
Christian criticism of Judaism, and it will be from this
angle that the respective beginnings of these two
institutions will be compared. The first half will
recount and synthesize existing scholarly explanations
of early Reform Judaism. It will explore its origins,
the impact of the evangelical Christian critique of
Judaism, and attempts to reform Reform Judaism. The
second half, reflecting the dearth of existing
scholarship, will look in greater detail at the
development of early Liberal Judaism. It will explore
the idea of Liberal Judaism as an alternative to
Orthodoxy and Reform, controversies regarding Christian
infuences, and the liberal Anglican impact of the
Christian critique of Judaism. |
|
|